[Numpy-discussion] Proposed Roadmap Overview
Russell E. Owen
Tue Feb 28 18:09:33 CST 2012
David Cournapeau <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Sturla Molden <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Â > In an ideal world, we would have a better language than C++ that can
> > be spit out as > C for portability.
> > What about a statically typed Python? (That is, not Cython.) We just
> > need to make the compiler :-)
> There are better languages than C++ that has most of the technical
> benefits stated in this discussion (rust and D being the most
> "obvious" ones), but whose usage is unrealistic today for various
> reasons: knowledge, availability on "esoteric" platforms, etcâ¦ A new
> language is completely ridiculous.
I just want to say that C++ has come a long way. I used to hate it, but
now that it has matured, and using some basic features of boost
(especially shared_ptr) can turn it into a really nice language. The
next version will be even better, but one can write nice C++ today.
shared_ptr allows objects that easily manage their own memory (basic
automatic garbage collection).
Generic programming seems like a really good fit to numpy's array types.
I am part of a large project that codes in C++ and Python and we find it
works very well for us.
I can't imagine working in C anymore and doing without exception
handling and namespaces. So I'm sorry to hear that C++ is not being
considered for a numpy rewrite.
More information about the NumPy-Discussion