[Numpy-discussion] Status of NumPy and Python 3.3
Sun Jul 29 10:26:46 CDT 2012
Ond??ej ??ert??k <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > This should be expected since the byte-swapped strings aren't valid.
> Exactly, I am aware that my solution is a hack. So is the Python 3.2
> solution, except that Python 3.2 doesn't seem to have
> the _PyUnicode_CheckConsistency() function, so no checks are done.
> As such, I think that my PR simply extends the numpy approach to Python 3.3.
Absolutely, I also think that using invalid Unicode strings in 3.2 looks kind
of hackish. -- Nothing wrong with your 3.3 implementation, it's the general
concept that I don't understand.
More information about the NumPy-Discussion