[Numpy-discussion] Created NumPy 1.7.x branch

Travis Oliphant travis@continuum...
Mon Jun 25 23:48:29 CDT 2012


>> In the present climate, I'm going to have to provide additional context to a comment like this.  This is not an accurate enough characterization of events.   I was trying to get date-time changes in, for sure.   I generally like feature additions to NumPy.   (Robert Kern was also involved with that effort and it was funded by an active user of NumPy.    I was concerned that the changes would break the ABI.
> 
> I did not mean to go back at old history, sorry. My main point was to
> highlight ABI vs API issues. Numpy needs to decide whether it attempts
> to keep ABI or not. We already had this discussion 2 years ago (for
> the issue mentioned by Ondrej), and the decision was not made. The
> arguments and their value did not really change. The issue is thus
> that a decision needs to be made over that disagreement in one way or
> the other.
> 

Thank you for clarifying and for being willing to look to the future.   I agree a decision needs to be made.   I think we will need to break the ABI.    At this point, I don't know of any pressing features that would require it short of NumPy 2.0.     

-Travis




> David
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion



More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list