[Numpy-discussion] Style for pad implementation in 'pad' namespace or functions under np.lib
Wed Mar 28 14:57:31 CDT 2012
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Tim Cera <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I have been developing a set of pad functions to pad arrays in different
> ways. Really close to having it accepted into numpy, but I want to revisit
> an implementation issue that I have become worried about. Should these
> functions be collected into a 'pad' namespace or put raw into np.lib?
> Do I really care about this? Not really since it isn't a utility issue,
> but I contend that it would look better to pull these functions into their
> own namespace.
> +1 one for a separate 'pad' or 'padding' namespace. Adding 10 functions to
the main numpy namespace feels like too much.
Is there a consensus?
> The current pull request:
> Kindest regards,
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion