[Numpy-discussion] Use OpenBLAS for the binary releases?

Sturla Molden sturla@molden...
Wed Nov 21 06:00:41 CST 2012


But do we need a binary OpenBLAS on Mac? Isn't there an accelerate framework with BLAS and LAPACK on that platform?

Sturla

Sendt fra min iPad

Den 21. nov. 2012 kl. 12:44 skrev David Cournapeau <cournape@gmail.com>:

> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Henry Gomersall <heng@cantab.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 10:49 +0000, David Cournapeau wrote:
>>> That's already what we do (on.windows anyway). The binary installer
>>> contains multiple arch binaries, and we pick the bewt one.
>> 
>> Interesting. Does it (or can it) extend to different algorithmic
>> implementations?
> 
> It is rather simple, in that it expects a different, full installer
> for each new combination. I would rather not complicate things too
> much there, as it is working well for its purpose and is not easy to
> modify. We would need something similar on Mac to make openblas a good
> replacement on that platform.
> 
> David
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list