[Numpy-discussion] Issue tracking
Thouis (Ray) Jones
Thu Oct 18 08:17:10 CDT 2012
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Ralf Gommers <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Nathaniel Smith <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Thouis (Ray) Jones <email@example.com>
>> > On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Thouis (Ray) Jones <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >> I plan to import all the Trac issues to github by the end of this
>> >> week. I want to get an up-to-date snapshot of the Trac DB, and run
>> >> another test import with it (just to make sure there's nothing in
>> >> recent bugs that isn't handled).
>> >> Previous test imports here:
>> >> https://github.com/thouis/numpy-trac-migration/issues
>> > I successfully imported all the issues from a more recent snapshot to
>> > the test repository as @numpy-gitbot, rather than @thouis (to save
>> > myself from getting pulled into every bug's discussion).
>> > If no one sees any problems with the latest imports (basically, the
>> > last 2000 or so by github issue #) , I think it's ready for the real
>> > transfer to the numpy github repository.
>> This is really fabulous; thanks for all the effort you've put in!
> Looks great to me too, don't see anything missing. Thanks a lot Ray!
>> But... I am quite concerned that we're still linking to attachments in
>> the trac, e.g.:
>> This means that we can't ever take down the trac without breaking all
>> our github issues; we're committing to keeping the trac running
>> indefinitely. Doesn't that kind of defeat a lot of the point...?
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
I plan to run the migration tomorrow (I promised the git users that
will be @-mentioned a day's warning, which I forgot to send until
More information about the NumPy-Discussion