[Numpy-discussion] timezones and datetime64
Francesc Alted
francesc@continuum...
Thu Apr 4 14:38:23 CDT 2013
On 4/4/13 8:56 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Francesc Alted <francesc@continuum.io> wrote:
>
>> That makes a difference. This can be specially important for creating
>> user-defined time origins:
>>
>> In []: np.array(int(1.5e9), dtype='datetime64[s]') + np.array(1,
>> dtype='timedelta64[ns]')
>> Out[]: numpy.datetime64('2017-07-14T04:40:00.000000001+0200')
> but that's worthless if you try it higher-resolution:
>
> In [40]: np.array(int(1.5e9), dtype='datetime64[s]')
> Out[40]: array(datetime.datetime(2017, 7, 14, 2, 40), dtype='datetime64[s]')
>
> # Start at 2017
>
> # add a picosecond:
> In [41]: np.array(int(1.5e9), dtype='datetime64[s]') + np.array(1,
> dtype='timedelta64[ps]')
> Out[41]: numpy.datetime64('1970-03-08T22:55:30.029526319105-0800')
>
> # get 1970???
This is clearly a bug. Could you file a ticket please?
Also, using attoseconds is giving a weird behavior:
In []: np.array(int(1.5e9), dtype='datetime64[s]') + np.array(1,
dtype='timedelta64[as]')
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OverflowError Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-42-acd66c465bef> in <module>()
----> 1 np.array(int(1.5e9), dtype='datetime64[s]') + np.array(1,
dtype='timedelta64[as]')
OverflowError: Integer overflow getting a common metadata divisor for
NumPy datetime metadata [s] and [as]
I would expect the attosecond to be happily ignored and nothing would be
added.
>
> And even with nanoseconds, given the leap-second issues, etc, you
> really wouldn't want to do this anyway -- rather, keep your epoch
> close by.
>
> Now that I think about it -- being able to set your epoch could lessen
> the impact of leap-seconds for second-resolution as well.
Probably this is the way to go, yes.
--
Francesc Alted
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list