[Numpy-discussion] Nanmean review
Sat Aug 10 02:21:11 CDT 2013
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 12:48 AM, David Reed <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> This is my first time contributing and I was hoping to get a review of a
> change I made. Here is the comparison link.
Hi David, your contribution looks good and adding nanmean is a good idea.
However, your code happens to overlap for almost 100% with an already
submitted pull request: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/3534. I suggest
that you compare your implementation with the one in PR-3534, and maybe you
can add an example there or fix some inconsistency.
This doesn't seem all that consistent by the way. The PR doesn't have an
example, so I don't know if it behaves the same:
>>> np.nanmean([1, np.nan, np.inf]) inf
>>> np.nanmean([1, np.nan, np.inf, np.NINF]) nan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion