[Numpy-discussion] return index of maximum value in an array easily?
Sebastian Berg
sebastian@sipsolutions....
Fri Jan 11 19:33:07 CST 2013
On Sat, 2013-01-12 at 00:26 +0100, Chao YUE wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know how others think about this. Like you point out, one can
> use
> np.nonzero(a==np.max(a)) as a workaround.
>
> For the second point, in case I have an array:
> a = np.arange(24.).reshape(2,3,4)
>
> suppose I want to find the index for maximum value of each 2X3 array
> along
> the 3rd dimension, what I can think of will be:
>
> index_list = []
> for i in range(a.shape[-1]):
> data = a[...,i]
> index_list.append(np.nonzero(data==np.max(data)))
>
To keep being close to min/max (and other ufunc based reduce
operations), it would seem consistent to allow something like
np.argmax(array, axis=(1, 2)), which would give a tuple of
arrays as result such that
array[np.argmax(array, axis=(1,2))] == np.max(array, axis=(1,2))
But apart from consistency, I am not sure anyone would get the idea of
giving multiple axes into the function...
>
> In [87]:
>
>
> index_list
> Out[87]:
> [(array([1]), array([2])),
> (array([1]), array([2])),
> (array([1]), array([2])),
> (array([1]), array([2]))]
>
>
> If we want to make the np.argmax function doing the job of this part
> of code,
> could we add another some kind of boolean keyword argument, for
> example,
> "exclude" to the function?
> [this is only my thinking, and I am only a beginner, maybe it's
> stupid!!!]
>
> np.argmax(a,axis=2,exclude=True) (default value for exclude is False)
>
> it will give the index of maximum value along all other axis except
> the axis=2
> (which is acutally the 3rd axis)
>
> The output will be:
>
> np.array(index_list).squeeze()
>
> array([[1, 2],
> [1, 2],
> [1, 2],
> [1, 2]])
>
> and one can use a[1,2,i] (i=1,2,3,4) to extract the maximum value.
>
> I doubt this is really useful...... too complicated......
>
> Chao
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Nathaniel Smith <njs@pobox.com>
> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Chao YUE
> <chaoyuejoy@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Are we going to consider returning the index of maximum
> value in an array
> > easily
> > without calling np.argmax and np.unravel_index
> consecutively?
>
>
> This does seem like a good thing to support somehow. What
> would a good
> interface look like? Something like np.nonzero(a ==
> np.max(a))? Should
> we support vectorized operation (e.g. argmax of each 2-d
> subarray of a
> 3-d array along some axis)?
>
> -n
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
>
>
>
> --
> ***********************************************************************************
> Chao YUE
> Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE-IPSL)
> UMR 1572 CEA-CNRS-UVSQ
> Batiment 712 - Pe 119
> 91191 GIF Sur YVETTE Cedex
> Tel: (33) 01 69 08 29 02; Fax:01.69.08.77.16
>
> ************************************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
More information about the NumPy-Discussion
mailing list