[Numpy-discussion] numpy.filled, again

Eric Firing efiring@hawaii....
Wed Jun 12 13:55:16 CDT 2013


On 2013/06/12 8:13 AM, Warren Weckesser wrote:
> That's why I suggested 'filledwith' (add the underscore if you like).
> This also allows a corresponding masked implementation, 'ma.filledwith',
> without clobbering the existing 'ma.filled'.

Consensus on np.filled? absolutely not, you do not have a consensus.

np.filledwith or filled_with: fine with me, maybe even with 
everyone--let's see.  I would prefer the underscore version.

Eric


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list