[Numpy-discussion] Seg. fault when running tests

Charles R Harris charlesr.harris@gmail....
Sat Jun 15 15:26:37 CDT 2013


On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Warren Weckesser <
warren.weckesser@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Julian Taylor <
> jtaylor.debian@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 15.06.2013 21:57, Warren Weckesser wrote:
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Julian Taylor
>>
>> >     @warren, can you please bisect the commit causing this?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Here's the culprit:
>> >
>> > aef286debfd11a62f1c337dea55624cee7fd4d9e is the first bad commit
>> > commit aef286debfd11a62f1c337dea55624cee7fd4d9e
>> > Author: Julian Taylor <jtaylor.debian@googlemail.com
>> > <mailto:jtaylor.debian@googlemail.com>>
>> > Date:   Mon Jun 10 19:38:58 2013 +0200
>> >
>> >     ENH: enable unaligned loads on x86
>> >
>> >     x86 can handle unaligned load and there is no hand vectorized code
>> in
>> >     this file. It would be a serious compiler bug if it adds
>> vectorization
>> >     without checking for alignment.
>> >     Enables fast complex128 copies which are unaligned on 32 bit gcc
>> unless
>> >     compiled with -malign-double.
>> >
>> > :040000 040000 d0948d1e1d942d41d50ce9e57bdc430db9a16f9e
>> > 45a48f383353857b8d0dd24e542c7ab6f137448c M  numpy
>> >
>> > Link:
>> >
>> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/commit/aef286debfd11a62f1c337dea55624cee7fd4d9e
>> >
>>
>> Interesting, possibly there is some inconsistencies in the macros in
>> this file.
>> But I don't understand why I can't reproduce it.
>> Does it happen with python 3.2 too?
>>
>
>
> Yes, it happens with 3.3.2, 3.3.1, and 3.2.5.
>

Also on 2.7. The -O3 flag seems to cause the problem.

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20130615/24b37112/attachment.html 


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list