[Numpy-discussion] numpy.filled, again

josef.pktd@gmai... josef.pktd@gmai...
Sat Jun 29 20:31:56 CDT 2013


On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Charles R Harris
<charlesr.harris@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 7:15 PM, <josef.pktd@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:43 PM, <josef.pktd@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Charles R Harris
>> >> <charlesr.harris@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Nathaniel Smith <njs@pobox.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So this petered off...any objections to np.full?
>> >
>> >
>> > No objection.
>>
>> full full full
>>
>> np.full  full of what?
>>
>> full of the number it's filledwith
>>
>> no objections so far, from what I remember of this thread
>>
>> we take an empty array, fill it and then it's "full"
>
>
> You mean "fulled"? ;)

It's really "full", if you want to put something else in there, you
need to replace something that is already in there.

Fortunately, arrays are mutable and not "constant"

(However np.empty doesn't give you an array that's really empty.)

Josef


>
> <snip>
>
> Chuck
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list