[Numpy-discussion] Execution time difference between 2.7 and 3.2 using numpy

Ralf Gommers ralf.gommers@gmail....
Sat Mar 23 07:17:28 CDT 2013


On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Todd <toddrjen@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> That's not the case. The official binaries for NumPy and SciPy are on
>> SourceForge. The Windows installers on PyPI are there to make easy_install
>> work, but they're likely slower than the SF installers (no SSE2/SSE3
>> instructions).
>>
>> Ralf
>>
>>
> Is there a reason why the same binaries can't be used for both?
>

The SF .exe superpack installers contains three installers: plain, SSE2 and
SSE3 support. easy_install doesn't know what to do with such an installer.
See
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.numeric.general/29395/focus=29582for
the discussion on why things are as they are now.

Ralf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20130323/87dee7a2/attachment.html 


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list