[SciPy-dev] Accessible SciPy (ASP) project
prabhu_r at users.sf.net
Mon Nov 1 03:14:22 CST 2004
>>>>> "RK" == Robert Kern <rkern at ucsd.edu> writes:
RK> IPython seems to be orthogonal to scipy. I'd be -1 on making
RK> IPython depend on scipy or scipy_core. IPython's potential
RK> audience is much wider than scipy's. Looking the other way, I
With all due respect to Fernando, I agree.
RK> don't think scipy would benefit much from having IPython as
RK> part of it. Perhaps when IPython gets rewritten to be a more
RK> flexible library for building interactive environments, then
RK> it would make some sense to bundle IPython into scipy.
Actually, that only makes the case stronger for it to be separate from
scipy. I think all that needs to be done is for IPython to be bundled
along with Enthon. Installing IPython on non-MS platforms is a
breeze. Perhaps a yum archive or something for those who don't want
to mess with source tarballs or GNU/stow.
Ideally, IPython should be the default Python shell, so it should
really become part of Python.
 -- I honestly think GNU/stow is a vastly underused piece of
software. Even on a Debian testing system I need to build packages
from source and GNU/stow makes managing these source based packages
almost totally painless.
More information about the Scipy-dev