[SciPy-dev] records and new NOTSWAPPED changes
oliphant.travis at ieee.org
Wed Dec 14 17:16:48 CST 2005
The recent NOTSWAPPED changes were once again prompted by closely trying
to understand records. I need to modify the behavior of the byteorder
argument to the records constructors and go back and make sure things
are still working. My thinking is that if the byteorder argument is
given it will force a particular byteorder on all the descriptors
(byte-order can also be indicated on the types themselves however):
formats = 'i4, (2,3)f8, a10' with byteorder = 'big'
would be equivalent to
formats = '>i4, (2,3)>f8, a10'
But, there are still some outstanding issues regarding the record arrays
and the new changes. I should be able to work them out in the next few
hours. But, just to let you know in case you try things and see the
errors on your new tests (thanks for those...)
Thanks for your help and encouragement. I really like where we are
ending up with this...
More information about the Scipy-dev