[SciPy-dev] Freeze Thursday at 5:00pm until further notice
jonathan.taylor at utoronto.ca
Thu Nov 10 13:56:13 CST 2005
What about just putting scipy_core into a new directory. I think that is
nearly equivelent functionally as having them in seperate repositories.
Maybe I am wrong?
On 11/10/2005, "Pearu Peterson" <pearu at scipy.org> wrote:
>On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Jonathan Taylor wrote:
>> If we go to trac, it would probabally be useful to have scipy and
>> scipy_core in the same repository. If so, then 5:00 might be the best
>> time to put both in the same repository. We would also get the benefit
>> of being able to svn mv ad svn cp files from scipy_core to scipy and
>> vice versa. Maybe I am not understanding a good reason for their
>> seperation though?
>The separation is due the fact that newcore is a replacement for Numeric
>and not all people need full scipy.
>Ideally, when checking out scipy, one should get also scipy_core:
>And when checking out scipy_core, one should get only scipy_core.
>This was easy to handle with CVS but as I have understood not so with SVN.
>In addtion, one needs to have scipy_core installed before building
>scipy. I think this is the main reason for keeping scipy_core and
>On the other hand, we could move the contents of scipy/Lib/ directory
>to scipy_core/scipy and have separate setup.py files for scipy and
>scipy_core. But that would mean that only-scipy_core interested people
>would get full scipy sources from SVN (unless there are some SVN tricks
>to prevent that).
>Scipy-dev mailing list
>Scipy-dev at scipy.net
More information about the Scipy-dev