[SciPy-dev] sparse matrix support status

[Robert Cimrman]

Jonathan Guyer wrote:
> I've finally done some benchmarking of scipy.sparse and PySparse and 
> posted my results and comments on plone[*]:
> 
>      <http://www.scipy.org/wikis/featurerequests/SparseSolvers>
> 
> Bottom line is that, with a couple of exceptions, PySparse is both 
> faster and less memory intensive than SciPy. I don't know whether 
> anything can be lifted from PySparse to improve SciPy's implementation.

Thanks for your 'great sparse shoot-out'! Just a little note: the link 
in the section discussing update_add_at() does not work for me (PAGE NOT 
FOUND).

r.