[SciPy-dev] Fwd: [sage-devel] numpy in SAGE, etc.
david.huard at gmail.com
Tue Dec 12 11:20:08 CST 2006
I followed this thread with much interest and I wouldn't like it to die
without some kind of concensus being reached for the Scipy documention
system. Am I correct to say that Epydoc + REST/Latex seems the way to go ?
If this is the case, what's next ? I'm not familiar with any of this, but
I'd be great if someone knowledgeable could define a roadmap and create a
couple of tickets so that people like me could contribute small steps.
2006/12/9, Jonathan Guyer <guyer at nist.gov>:
> On Dec 9, 2006, at 12:31 AM, Alan G Isaac wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Jonathan Guyer apparently wrote:
> >> Do you know if any of that actually works? The last time
> >> I looked at it, I couldn't figure out what to do with it.
> > *If* it works? Yes: it works great.
> I see my confusion. I'd gotten the sandbox via svn along with
> docutils HEAD, and it doesn't work with that (it throws an error deep
> within docutils).
> I switched to docutils-0.4 and it seems fine.
> Scipy-dev mailing list
> Scipy-dev at scipy.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Scipy-dev