[SciPy-dev] Time to require python 2.4?

Tim Leslie tim.leslie at gmail.com
Tue Dec 26 20:56:11 CST 2006


On 12/27/06, Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com> wrote:
> Tim Leslie wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'd like to start a discussion to see whether it's time for scipy to
> > require Python 2.4. 2.4 has been out for over two years now (released
> > in Nov 2004) and there is at least one outstanding patch for scipy
> > which requires 2.4[1]. AFAIK there are no major distributions for
> > which 2.3 is the default version.
>
> Debian stable and OS X are still major distributions, in my mind.
>

My bad, I probably should have said "easily available" rather than
"default version".

> > What do other people think? Are there any plans to make 2.4 a
> > requirement in the near future? Are there many people who still use
> > 2.3? Is this something that might be considered for the next release?
>
> Yes, I think, many people still use Python 2.3. As for the patch, there's
> nothing intrinsic to Python 2.4 that it requires. It simply takes advantage of
> Python 2.4 syntax sugar; it does not have to do so.
>

This is true.

> IMO, widely-used libraries should continue to support Python distributions until
> there is a really compelling new feature that cannot be implemented in the old
> versions and that we should not drop support for old versions just because they
> are old. Most of the "missing features" that I encountered while targeting
> Python 2.3 were set(), generator expressions, and decorators. All of them are
> very easily worked around in 2.3.
>
> So my question to you is, specifically what features are only in 2.4 that you
> think we need to use to support new features in scipy?
>

There are none in particular, I just wanted to test the water and see
what the status on this issue was. The ticket posted was merely the
catalyst for enquiry. If the benefits of the new features aren't
considered enough to warrant a change then I'm happy for us to stick
with 2.3. I'd like to hear where other people stand on this issue and
perhaps see what criteria would be sufficient to require an update in
the required python version. Thanks for your input on this Robert.

Cheers,

Tim

> --
> Robert Kern
>
> "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
>  that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
>  an underlying truth."
>   -- Umberto Eco
> _______________________________________________
> Scipy-dev mailing list
> Scipy-dev at scipy.org
> http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>


More information about the Scipy-dev mailing list