[SciPy-dev] Another segfault

[Travis Oliphant]

David M. Cooke wrote:

>"Nils Wagner" <nwagner at mecha.uni-stuttgart.de> writes:
>
>  
>
>>On a 64 bit machine scipy.test(1,10) results in a segfault
>>The bt message differs from the bt on a 32 bit machine.
>>For what reason ?
>>
>>Test whether the lu_solve command segfaults, as reported 
>>by NilsUse minimum degree ordering on A'+A.
>>
>>Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>>[Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 5170)]
>>0x00002aaaae34d787 in zpivotL (jcol=0, u=1, 
>>usepr=0x7fffffc62264, perm_r=0xc9c7d0, iperm_r=0xbd8c60,
>>     iperm_c=0xdb55c0, pivrow=0x7fffffc62270, Glu=0x0, 
>>stat=0xffffffffab80bb68) at zpivotL.c:121
>>121             perm_r[*pivrow] = jcol;
>>    
>>
>
>btw, I can reproduce this on my 64-bit machine (grr, can't run
>scipy.test() right now because of it).
>  
>

I'm wondering if this has to do with the two integer arrays that make up 
the csc and csr representations of a sparse matrix.  I'm looking for 
where they are checked to make sure they are the right type (need to be 
int).  And I'm not finding it.

-Travis