Alan G Isaac
aisaac at american.edu
Fri Mar 10 12:26:47 CST 2006
> Johannes Löhnert wrote:
>> I just noticed that in function numpy.random.randint, the
>> shape=... keyword was replaced by size=...
>> I find this somewhat counterintuitive, as it denotes
>> the shape of the desired array (as tuple),
>> although it also takes integer values. Also it is an
>> unnecessary break with backwards compatibility (to RandomArray).
>> I would suggest to allow both "shape" & "size", with
>> "shape" having precedence.
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Robert Kern apparently wrote:
> It was a choice for compatibility with the scipy PRNGs all of which use "size".
> "shape" was not a good argument name because many of the probability
> distributions have a "shape" parameter.
> I don't think it's wise to make more ways to do exactly
> the same thing.
But this is really horrible:
>>> import numpy as N
>>> x = N.random.standard_normal(size=(3,2))
>>> x = N.random.standard_normal(shape=(3,2))
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
TypeError: 'shape' is an invalid keyword argument for this function
Since numpy is less than version 1, this really should be
changed for consistency, and allowing both for a while with
a deprecation warning on 'size' is reasonable.
I do not think any of the numpy distributions have a competing 'shape'
parameter, but if so that just makes the situation *worse*.
A user's opinion,
More information about the Scipy-dev