[SciPy-dev] mlabwrap scikit [Was: Re: scikits project]
Mon Apr 9 20:41:05 CDT 2007
Robert Kern <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> >>>> If so it should also use numpy.distutils. Just make sure to import
> >>>> setuptools first.
> >>>> import setuptools
> >>>> from numpy.distutils.core import setup
> >>>> ...
> >>> Is there a recipe/template for this somewhere? Googling "scipy setuptools"
> >>> comes up with
> >>> <http://projects.scipy.org/ipython/ipython/wiki/SetupTools>
> >>> as the first hit, which seems to indicate that setuptools is still a bit alpha
> >>> and the docs can't be trusted if one wants something that actually works.
> >> Fernando's a curmudgeon, and that page is old. Ignore him. :-)
> > OK, I'm going the``ez_setup.py`` way.
> No, ez_setup.py is deprecated. That part of the setuptools docs is out of date.
> When the Cheeseshop comes back up read this page with up-to-date information
> about how to get going with setuptools:
> > Surely there must be some way to write packages that depend on numpy but
> > can be installed automatically (and download numpy if required)?
> Not really. The dependencies that you can specify are requirements for using the
> package after it is installed, not requirements for building the package. The
> structure of distutils setup.py files pretty much enforces this. setuptools
> doesn't really get to do anything until setup() is called, i.e. after you've
> used your dependencies.
> You might be able to hack something together with
> pkg_resources.WorkingSet.resolve(), though.
> > And why do I need to use
> > numpy.distutils in the first place?
> <shrug> You don't strictly have to. numpy.get_include() is probably sufficient
> for you, but it has the same problem.
> > Another thing: should ``scikits/__init__.py`` be really empty? From
> > <http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/setuptools#namespace-packages>
> > it looks a bit to me like it should contain:
> > __import__('pkg_resources').declare_namespace(__name__)
> > ?
> Yes, apologies.
OK, I think the upshot of all this is that I'll figure out how to do a robust
and user-friendly setuptools-based package another time. I don't want to delay
the release of 1.0 any further so I'll release mlabwrap-1.0final on SF as a
distutils based install with the old (scikits-less) package structure. Since
post-1.0 mlabwrap will represent a break anyway (Numeric support will be
dropped, newer version of python and matlab might be required and the
interface might change in some not backwards-compatible ways), the need to
change the important statement is maybe not a bad thing.
> > Finally, what is the preferred download url for scikits projects? Should I
> > continue to host the file-release on SF, or should they go somewhere else?
> I recommend putting them on the Cheeseshop.
Thanks, will do.
> > Same for the webpage.
> scipy.org wiki if you can.
I could make http://www.scipy.org/MlabWrap the project webpage and move its
current (developer-only contents) into some subdir -- does that sound
> > So I think some kind of template for scikit authors would be useful and I'd
> > suggest that once I've got setup.py etc. ironed out I put some info for other
> > prospective scikit authors on a wikipage on scipy.org -- what would be a good
> > place?
I tried to create a trac account ('aschmolck') there but it didn't work; a new
account seems to have been created (the name is taken) but I can't log into
it. Do I need some other type of account first in order to be able to create
the trac account? When I click on "create account" I get an authorization
dialog, but the just created login and password don't work (I verified by
going through the same process with login/passwd test_user).
More information about the Scipy-dev