[SciPy-dev] Proposal for more generic optimizers (posted before on scipy-user)
Thu Mar 8 13:21:44 CST 2007
> > For the etcetera argument, I suppose a **parameter is
> > a good choice
> It is the obvious choice, but I am not sure what the best
> approach will be. Presumably implementation will be
Some of the arguments cannot be decided beforehand. For instance, for a
damped optimizer, which sets of parameters should be saved ? Everyone,
including each that is tested for minimization of the function, or only the
one at the end of the loop ?
I'll make a simple proposal for the interface with the modifications I added
since your email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Scipy-dev