[SciPy-dev] symeig integration ready
Tue Nov 18 13:27:20 CST 2008
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Tiziano Zito <email@example.com> wrote:
> Is it OK to break backward-compatibility? Code would only break if
> someone was specifing keyword arguments as positional arguments...
> Same thing for the eigvalsh routine.
That's OK with me, but I don't have a strong opinion on it.
> - I added 129 tests to test_decomp.py using the marvelous nose
> parametric tests feature. They run pretty fast, and they excercise
> all relevant lapack routines with most (but not all) combinations
> of parameters. Is it OK? Should I flag those tests as "less"
> important so that they are not run by default?
That is excellent! I would just leave them as is for now. I would
rather have the tests running relatively aggressively for the upcoming
0.7.0b1 release by default.
> If everything is all right with you I would commit the changes
> tomorrow. I will also continue to provide symeig as a standalone
> module until scipy 0.7 is released and a corresponding debian
> package is available. A new release with all changes (and bug-fixes
> :-)) I made to incorporate it in scipy will be released soon.
Thank you very much for putting the effort into getting this done. If
you could, I would appreciate it if you would add this to the release
Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs
10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley
More information about the Scipy-dev