[SciPy-dev] The future of SciPy and its development infrastructure

Michael Abshoff michael.abshoff@googlemail....
Mon Feb 23 15:46:10 CST 2009


Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
> Hi Josef

Hello folks,

> 2009/2/23  <josef.pktd@gmail.com>:
>> I agree it is a good idea, theoretically, but
>>
>> Maybe I'm slightly pessimistic, but almost the only comment or review
>> for my bugfixes in scipy.stats that I got, were from Per Brodtkorb,
>> and my tickets and patches were sitting for half a year in trac.. If I
>> have to wait for a review, then ...
> 
> I hope that, if we have a decent workflow in place, this kind of thing
> won't happen any longer.  I can't go onto trac and search for "tickets
> with patches that needs review".

Well, it can be done even with trac 0.10.x:

http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report

We adopted the workflow in Sage around trac and it has been running 
rather smoothly.

Now that we updated trac to 0.11.3 we will use workflows to get around 
the rather primitive manual need to change summaries. But as often KISS 
works really weel.

Cheers,

Michael


More information about the Scipy-dev mailing list