[SciPy-dev] The future of SciPy and its development infrastructure
Travis E. Oliphant
Thu Feb 26 17:52:09 CST 2009
Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:58:03 -0600, Travis E. Oliphant wrote:
> Anyway, difficult to tell how a mandatory review policy would affect
> Scipy's development. I'd be reluctant to jump headfirst to requiring it,
> without experimenting, even if Sage and Sympy have had good experience
> about it. Nevertheless, I'm going to try to change my own workflow and
> see what happens.
I'm willing to do this as well. I love seeing the enthusiasm behind
getting a description of how to contribute to SciPy up on the wiki and
the effort put in to testing DVCS. That alone is worth encouraging if
I can by switching my own workflow.
More information about the Scipy-dev