[SciPy-Dev] request for testing: SciPy 0.7.2 RC1 + NumPy 1.4.1 RC1

josef.pktd@gmai... josef.pktd@gmai...
Tue Apr 6 13:43:35 CDT 2010


On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Bruce Southey <bsouthey@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 04/06/2010 10:11 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Bruce Southey <bsouthey@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 04/05/2010 10:33 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Bruce Southey <bsouthey@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> HI,
>>> Scipy installed okay on Win7 pro 32 bit Python 2.6 but the tests were
>>> interesting.  Several times during the scipy.test() windows came and
>>> went. There are also warnings indicating some incompatibility.
>>
>> Windows should not be popping up, unless you're also running doctests with
>> plot commands. Any idea what they are? If not, can you narrow it down by
>> running tests for the individual modules?
>>
>> All I did was 'import scipy' and then run 'scipy.test()' so I do did not
>> tell it to run any doctests.
>
> So can you run the module tests?
>>>> scipy.integrate.test()
>>>> scipy.optimize.test()
> etc. Then maybe you can find out where those windows are coming from.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Why is the histogram warning here? It does say removal in Numpy 1.4 so
>>> should be gone. Also, shouldn't some of the other stats functions also
>>> be removed?
>>
>> These things should have been removed but weren't in 1.4.0, I just kept it
>> that way. It can still be removed of course, but maybe this is better done
>> (or already done) in trunk?
>>
>> David Huard did bring the histogram issue up but apparently it was no
>> addressed:
>> http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2009-December/047389.html
>>
>> If it is not removed then can you please clarify what 'Numpy 1.4' means?
>>
>>
>
> Well, even though the numpy 1.4.0 binary was removed from sourceforge, I
> regarded that as 'Numpy 1.4'. So I see 1.4.1 as a bug-fix release for 1.4.0,
> not the place to remove something. Updating the docstring like David H.
> suggested makes more sense to me.
>
> That said, I don't feel strongly about it either way.
>
> In regards to scipy, this is the scipy ticket 1120:
> http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/ticket/1120
>
> I think this ticket can be closed because the offending line has been fixed
> in the SVN.

Thanks for pointing it out. I closed the ticket.

Josef

>
> Bruce
>
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
> SciPy-Dev@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>
>


More information about the SciPy-Dev mailing list