[SciPy-dev] Latex and docstrings
David Goldsmith
d.l.goldsmith@gmail....
Fri Feb 19 15:32:23 CST 2010
Never mind, I remembered I can get this from the Wiki also. SFTN.
DG
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:30 PM, David Goldsmith <d.l.goldsmith@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi, folks! OK, at this point, can someone(s) please summarize precisely
> where changes have been made as a result of this thread? (I don't need to
> know what the changes were, of course, 'cause I can get those from the
> Wiki.) Thanks!
>
> DG
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:24 AM, <josef.pktd@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Tom Grydeland <tom.grydeland@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:45 AM, Tom Grydeland <
>> tom.grydeland@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> Do you want me to fix the latex errors?
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:24 PM, <josef.pktd@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Yes, please, and make any adjustment that you find usefule.
>> >
>> > Okay, they are fixed, and I unified all the references cited also.
>> >
>> >> I didn't want to copy too much from the numpy docs since we can also
>> >> just refer to it. For my reading an abridged explanation refering to
>> >> the numpy docs, and a more complete collection of the extra parts that
>> >> in scipy would be useful. But we haven't had much discussion yet on
>> >> doc duplication between scipy and numpy (which is also relevant for
>> >> the descriptions of the distributions in numpy.random and
>> >> scipy.stats.distributions)
>> >
>> > I'm fine either way, but I think for a tutorial page for fftpack it
>> > seems odd to define the DCT in that level of detail and then refer
>> > elsewhere for the DFT definition.
>>
>> I don't have a strong opinion either.
>> The numpy.fft module docstring is short enough (when rendered on the
>> webpage) that most of it can be repeated. My initial thought was that
>> fft in scipy could be explained more in terms of fft2 and fftn, with
>> examples for those. (I just recently struggled with fftn and there is
>> not much example code available.)
>> I think, the definitions and formulas should be included for all
>> transforms in any case.
>>
>> Josef
>>
>> >
>> >> Josef
>> >
>> > --
>> > Tom Grydeland
>> > <Tom.Grydeland@(gmail.com)>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > SciPy-Dev mailing list
>> > SciPy-Dev@scipy.org
>> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> SciPy-Dev mailing list
>> SciPy-Dev@scipy.org
>> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/attachments/20100219/cfe75e16/attachment.html
More information about the SciPy-Dev
mailing list