Tue Jun 1 03:09:50 CDT 2010
On May 31, 2010, at 9:16 AM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> This is more about the process then the content, distributions was
> Travis's baby (although unfinished), and most of his changes are very
> good, but I don't want to look for the 5-10% (?) typos anymore.
I really am not sure what the difference between looking at timeline of changes and a formal "review" process really is? In either case you are "looking for someone's mistakes or problems". I do think your estimate of typos is a bit aggressive. Really? 5-10% typos. What is the denominator?
More information about the SciPy-Dev