[SciPy-Dev] Clarification: is the Extended Summary section optional?

David Goldsmith d.l.goldsmith@gmail....
Wed Jun 2 13:47:05 CDT 2010


I'm working on the docstrings - is any one else?

DG

2010/6/2 Stéfan van der Walt <stefan@sun.ac.za>

> On 2 June 2010 11:35, David Goldsmith <d.l.goldsmith@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I'm encountering many SciPy docstrings
> >
> > I'm not talking about NumPy docstrings; I'm not looking at/touching NumPy
> > docstrings; I'm only going after low-hangingl SciPy fruit.
>
> I think Ralf's point was that we have more important things to do than
> nitpick around whether some functions should have extended sections or
> not.  Let's get cracking on the many docstrings that are not even
> close to done.
>
> Regards
> Stéfan
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
> SciPy-Dev@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>



-- 
Mathematician: noun, someone who disavows certainty when their uncertainty
set is non-empty, even if that set has measure zero.

Hope: noun, that delusive spirit which escaped Pandora's jar and, with her
lies, prevents mankind from committing a general suicide.  (As interpreted
by Robert Graves)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/attachments/20100602/4de51b56/attachment.html 


More information about the SciPy-Dev mailing list