[SciPy-Dev] [Numpy-discussion] ANN: scipy 0.10 release candidate 1

[Bruce Southey]

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Ralf Gommers
<ralf.gommers@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Christoph Gohlke <cgohlke@uci.edu> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/9/2011 12:01 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Scott Sinclair
>> > <scott.sinclair.za@gmail.com <mailto:scott.sinclair.za@gmail.com>>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >     On 5 November 2011 20:29, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers@googlemail.com
>> >     <mailto:ralf.gommers@googlemail.com>> wrote:
>> >     >  Please try this release and report problems on the mailing list.
>> >     >  Note: one problem with Python 2.5 (syntax) was discovered after
>> >     tagging the
>> >     >  release, it's fixed in the 0.10.x branch already so no need to
>> >     report that
>> >     >  one.
>> >
>> >     For whatever it's worth, no problems on my 64-bit Ubuntu system.
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks, that's definitely worth something. If I don't hear anything, I
>> > wonder if there are no problems or if no one is testing.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Ralf
>>
>> Hi Ralf,
>>
>> the msvc9/MKL builds for win32 and win-amd64 are also working well.
>>
>> Christoph
>>
> Great, thanks!
>
> Ralf
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
> SciPy-Dev@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>
>
Well,
According to Sourceforge, some people have downloaded the RC1 in various forms:
 25 downloads of the x86 Python 2.5 binary :-)
658 downloads of the x86 Python 2.6 binary
377 downloads of the x86 Python 2.7 binary
278 and 43 of the two source codes.

So I would assume that there are no new problems. I have not seen any
more failures with Python 2.7, 3.1 and 3.2.

Bruce