[SciPy-Dev] Numpy-dev and scipy-0.10.1 test errors
Christoph Gohlke
cgohlke@uci....
Tue Feb 21 02:59:09 CST 2012
On 2/20/2012 11:49 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Christoph Gohlke <cgohlke@uci.edu
> <mailto:cgohlke@uci.edu>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/20/2012 1:59 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Christoph Gohlke
> <cgohlke@uci.edu <mailto:cgohlke@uci.edu>
> <mailto:cgohlke@uci.edu <mailto:cgohlke@uci.edu>>> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> while testing msvc9/MKL builds of scipy-0.10.1rc1 and
> numpy-dev on
> win-amd64-py2.7 I got 20 numpy test errors and 2 scipy test
> errors.
> The full tests results are attached. I have not looked at
> them in
> detail. There are no test errors or failures with numpy
> 1.6.1 and
> scipy-0.10.1rc1.
>
>
> Christoph, with current master plus PRs 214 and 215 all the
> numpy test
> errors you're seeing should be fixed, with the exception of the
> numpy.ma <http://numpy.ma>
> <http://numpy.ma> one. Could you please verify that, and have a
> look at
>
> what's going on with the last error (does it just need to be
> silenced,
> or is there a problem?).
>
> Ralf
>
>
>
> Errors are down to 14. The test output is attached.
>
> I discovered one mistake in the commit that should have fixed the umath
> RuntimeWarnings. Should be fixed in PR-215 now.
Didn't help. _FilterInvalids.setUp and tearDown are never executed.
>
> The datetime errors should have been fixed by PR-213, which has merged
> into master just before I sent the previous email. Was that included for
> your last build?
You are right, I/git must have pulled the whole datetime_strings.c file,
instead of just the changes, from PR214. No more datetime errors.
Christoph
>
> Thanks,
> Ralf
>
>
More information about the SciPy-Dev
mailing list