[SciPy-Dev] pull requests and code review
Thu Jan 5 18:41:39 CST 2012
I don't think there should be any time limit on pull requests. Who is the *we* that needs time to look at them. I did take time to look at the changes. The code changes were not extensive (except for the very nice tests), and it is a welcome change.
Your feedback on the use of inspect is very good. We can take a look at whether or not it method calls were considered and fix it if it does.
If you are interested in continuing to review all the optimize changes, I will make sure and give you time to review in the future. This is where having a list of interested and available parties for different modules would make a great deal of sense.
On Jan 5, 2012, at 6:19 PM, email@example.com wrote:
> Can we keep pull requests open for more than 3 hours, so we actually
> have time to look at them.
> looking at
> my first guess is that the use of inspect.getargspec breaks when the
> hessian is a method attached to a class, as we have almost all our
> code in statsmodels.
> We just fixed a similar case in scipy.
> There should be at least time to check whether this kind of suspicions
> are justified or not.
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
More information about the SciPy-Dev