[SciPy-Dev] SciPy-Dev Digest, Vol 99, Issue 31

stuart stewie.hannah@gmail....
Sat Jan 14 17:55:35 CST 2012


http://i.imgur.com/bHLym.jpg

On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 12:00 -0600, scipy-dev-request@scipy.org wrote:
> Send SciPy-Dev mailing list submissions to
> 	scipy-dev@scipy.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	scipy-dev-request@scipy.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	scipy-dev-owner@scipy.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SciPy-Dev digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Summarizing the scikit-signal discussion (Jaidev Deshpande)
>    2. Re: Summarizing the scikit-signal discussion (Travis Oliphant)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 01:11:08 +0530
> From: Jaidev Deshpande <deshpande.jaidev@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [SciPy-Dev] Summarizing the scikit-signal discussion
> To: SciPy Developers List <scipy-dev@scipy.org>
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAB=suEnTQwfzHjJxO-nxEnvyP4D9sqU15G25VKGoUOB-98Vufw@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> Hi
> 
> We've jumped to a separate scikit project only because it will be
> easier to develop and maintain.
> 
> Once it gets off the ground, the community can choose to put the
> project wherever they like.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jaidev
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:17:05 -0600
> From: Travis Oliphant <travis@continuum.io>
> Subject: Re: [SciPy-Dev] Summarizing the scikit-signal discussion
> To: SciPy Developers List <scipy-dev@scipy.org>
> Message-ID: <4A1F92B9-B76F-4B5D-ABA5-E4CBE6826DB9@continuum.io>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> I wish you all well.   I think this is unfortunate, however.  
> 
> I think it would be better to make a branch of scipy.signal and develop all you want there.    There is a need for active development in scipy.signal.  
> 
> But, I can understand wanting a faster development cycle and wanting less interference with design decisions based on a larger project goals until you are farther along.
> 
> Ultimately, I'm excited people will be writing more signal processing code for Python.   
> 
> -Travis
> 
> 
> On Jan 13, 2012, at 1:41 PM, Jaidev Deshpande wrote:
> 
> > Hi
> > 
> > We've jumped to a separate scikit project only because it will be
> > easier to develop and maintain.
> > 
> > Once it gets off the ground, the community can choose to put the
> > project wherever they like.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Jaidev
> > _______________________________________________
> > SciPy-Dev mailing list
> > SciPy-Dev@scipy.org
> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
> SciPy-Dev@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
> 
> 
> End of SciPy-Dev Digest, Vol 99, Issue 31
> *****************************************




More information about the SciPy-Dev mailing list