[SciPy-Dev] update on 0.11.0 status
Ralf Gommers
ralf.gommers@googlemail....
Tue Jul 10 15:34:40 CDT 2012
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Jake Vanderplas <
vanderplas@astro.washington.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
> The graph_laplacian issue is fixed in PR 266, which I just opened [1].
> There is still the related but larger issue of errant fancy indexing in LIL
> matrix, discussed in ticket 1681 [2]. The LIL issue is more complicated,
> as it has potential for breaking backward compatibility.
>
> Great. If that is fixed, I'm not sure if the LIL issue is still a blocker.
I have still been unable to reproduce the csgraph.shortest_path failure.
>
I can reproduce this for about 1 in 10 runs, which is really weird because
I can't find any randomness in the test or code. Plus, it once again shows
how annoying generator tests are; can't see which method is failing.
Failures are also not always the same:
<failure 1>
x and y nan location mismatch:
x: array([[ 0., nan, 3., 2., 4.],
[ nan, nan, nan, nan, nan],
[ 1., nan, 0., 3., 5.],
[ 1., nan, 4., 0., 3.]])
y: array([[ 0., 3., 3., 1., 2.],
[ 3., 0., 6., 2., 4.],
[ 3., 6., 0., 4., 5.],
[ 1., 2., 4., 0., 2.]])
<failure 2>
(mismatch 30.0%)
x: array([[ 0., 3., 3., 2., 4.],
[ 3., 0., 6., 2., 4.],
[ 3., 6., 0., 5., 7.],
[ 1., 1., 4., 0., 3.]])
y: array([[ 0., 3., 3., 1., 2.],
[ 3., 0., 6., 2., 4.],
[ 3., 6., 0., 4., 5.],
[ 1., 2., 4., 0., 2.]])
Any idea where to look?
Ralf
> Jake
>
> [1] https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/266
> [2] http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/ticket/1681
>
>
> On 07/10/2012 07:13 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a short update on the status of the 0.11.0 release. Some of the
> reported issues for the beta release have been fixed or PRs for them are
> waiting to be merged. There is one failure not yet fixed
> (sparse.csgrapg.shortest_path failure) and one blocker also in the
> sparse.csgraph module: http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/ticket/1681. Once
> the csgraph issues are fixed we're ready to release the first RC.
>
> To be merged and backported:
> Umfpack failure: https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/257
> Interpolate failure under Python 3.x:
> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/258
>
> To not fix: weave error when running the tests under Python 3.x. It's not
> easy to avoid the printed error, because importing the whole module fails.
> And in the end the result is the same, weave doesn't work at all for 3.x.
>
> Cheers,
> Ralf
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing listSciPy-Dev@scipy.orghttp://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
> SciPy-Dev@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/attachments/20120710/79c5c2e4/attachment.html
More information about the SciPy-Dev
mailing list