[SciPy-Dev] Bundling Boost?
Mon Oct 8 12:27:43 CDT 2012
Andy, I agree with your point but why are you linking to boost trunk as
opposed to tests against a recent release? My understanding is that the
IBM compiler team, for example, always makes sure that some version of
boost builds against their C++ compilers, even if it is not bleeding-edge.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Andy Ray Terrel <firstname.lastname@example.org>wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Charles R Harris
> <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Anthony Scopatz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> >> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Andy Ray Terrel <email@example.com
> >> wrote:
> >>> To comment on compiler support for boost, I have supported Boost on
> >>> Intel for some time. The problem compilers are pgi and xl, but there
> >>> is pressure on these vendors to better support metatemplate
> >>> progamming.
> >> I second Andy's comments about pgi and xl. Otherwise, I am generally in
> >> favor
> >> of adding Boost.
> > I don't think the special_functions make use of metatemplate techniques.
> > ublas templates in boost/math do, but that is a different application.
> > Chuck
> Well pgi is still doing really bad.
> > _______________________________________________
> > SciPy-Dev mailing list
> > SciPy-Dev@scipy.org
> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the SciPy-Dev