[SciPy-Dev] issues trac migration review
Mon Apr 22 14:06:40 CDT 2013
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Skipper Seabold <email@example.com>wrote:
> Many of the issues have been migrated. Please have a look and let me
> know of any problems.
Looks good! Github even de-uglified the labels, so it's possible to look at
the issue list for more than 30s :)
> I got rate limited by github, so I will have to continue later tonight
> to make sure there are no problems.
> You'll notice that I used the same @ -> atmention: substitution for
> now so that people don't get notifications, as I'm working out the
> kinks. I used the same trac -> github mapping as the numpy migration
> and added several more by hand of names I recognized as being a
> duplicate e-mail address of a regular contributor.
> If we want different issue labels, let me know. It's probably easier
> to format them now than to do it later.
There are several components that should be removed (pyem, numexpr,
linsolve, svm, maxentropy). The colors also need tweaking, but that can be
> Anything else?
Attachments. This is a bigger issue for scipy than it was for numpy, and we
don't really have a good solution I think. Were you planning to leave the
old ones at Trac, and keep that alive for a long time? We don't need new
patches as attachment, but we do need something for data files.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the SciPy-Dev