[SciPy-Dev] issues trac migration review

josef.pktd@gmai... josef.pktd@gmai...
Mon Apr 22 14:27:22 CDT 2013


On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.brett@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Skipper Seabold <jsseabold@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Many of the issues have been migrated. Please have a look and let me
>> know of any problems.
>>
>> https://github.com/jseabold/scipy-trac-migration/issues?state=open
>>
>> I got rate limited by github, so I will have to continue later tonight
>> to make sure there are no problems.
>>
>> You'll notice that I used the same @ -> atmention: substitution for
>> now so that people don't get notifications, as I'm working out the
>> kinks. I used the same trac -> github mapping as the numpy migration
>> and added several more by hand of names I recognized as being a
>> duplicate e-mail address of a regular contributor.
>
> If you see duplicates maybe note them in a scipy .mailmap?
>
>> If we want different issue labels, let me know. It's probably easier
>> to format them now than to do it later.
>
> I guess there is no way to give the github issue dates from the trac tickets?
>
> It is worth adding a label 'trac import' to these issues?  If the
> dates are not right then these guys will end up in the middle of the
> issues list by date (old pull requests going earlier).  I can imagine
> wanting to go back to try and clear up old trac tickets in particular.
>
> Otherwise - looks good to me - thanks very much for doing this,

Is there a way to get changeset links ?

for example
changeset:5972
in last comment here https://github.com/jseabold/scipy-trac-migration/issues/620

The only thing I have seen so far.

Josef

>
> Cheers
>
> Matthew
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
> SciPy-Dev@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev


More information about the SciPy-Dev mailing list