[SciPy-Dev] ANN: Scipy 0.13.0 beta 1 release

Ralf Gommers ralf.gommers@gmail....
Sat Aug 31 05:36:41 CDT 2013


On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu>wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 11:11:36AM +0200, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu
> >wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 03:12:21PM +0200, Ralf Gommers wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I'm happy to announce the availability of the first beta release of
> Scipy
> > > > 0.13.0. Please try this beta and report any issues on the scipy-dev
> > > mailing
> > > > list.
> > > >
> > > > Source tarballs and release notes can be found at
> > > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/scipy/files/scipy/0.13.0b1/.
> Windows
> > > and
> > > > OS X installers will follow later (we have a minor infrastructure
> issue
> > > to
> > > > solve, and I'm at EuroScipy now).
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Ralf
> > >
> > > Ralf,
> > >    FYI, if the proposed elimination of support for the Accelerate
> > > framework on
> > > darwin was implemented in scipy 0.13, you will definietely want to
> > > consider reverting that
> > > change. It appears that the issues in the Accelerate framework (at
> least as
> > > tested with scipy 0.12.0) are resolved in the next darwin release...
> > >
> >
> > Hi Jack, the issues appear to have been resolved completely (thanks to
> > Michael Wimmer and Pauli), so we didn't drop support or used OpenBLAS for
> > the binaries.
> >
> > Ralf
>
> Ralf,
>    Unfortunately, I am seeing a linkage failure in 0.13.0 beta1 on
> darwin13 using
> the same build recipe that we use in fink for 0.12.0...
>

Hi Jack, does the same recipe work on OS X 10.8 with 0.13.0b1? And could
you try building 050ac31c6e5? That's before some build changes to split all
the Fortran files, so it will help to figure out if those build changes
introduced the issue.

Thanks,
Ralf

<note to self: darwin13 is the not yet released OS X 10.9>


> ...<snip>.....
> p.macosx-10.9-x86_64-2.7/scipy/linalg/src/id_dist/src/prini_subr_2.o
> build/temp.macosx-10.9-x86_64-2.7/scipy/linalg/src/id_dist/src/prini_subr_3.o
> build/temp.macosx-10.9-x86_64-2.7/scipy/linalg/src/id_dist/src/prini_subr_4.o
> build/temp.macosx-10.9-x86_64-2.7/scipy/linalg/src/id_dist/src/pri
>  ni_subr_5.o
> build/temp.macosx-10.9-x86_64-2.7/scipy/linalg/src/id_dist/src/prini_subr_6.o
> -L/sw/lib/gcc4.8/lib/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin13.0.0/4.8.1
> -Lbuild/temp.macosx-10.9-x86_64-2.7 -lgfortran -o
> build/lib.macosx-10.9-x86_64-2.7/scipy/linalg/_interpolative.so
> -Wl,-framework -Wl,Accelerate
> Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
>   "_PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords", referenced from:
>       _f2py_rout__interpolative_id_srand in _interpolativemodule.o
>       _f2py_rout__interpolative_id_srandi in _interpolativemodule.o
>       _f2py_rout__interpolative_id_srando in _interpolativemodule.o
>       _f2py_rout__interpolative_idd_frm in _interpolativemodule.o
>       _f2py_rout__interpolative_idd_sfrm in _interpolativemodule.o
>       _f2py_rout__interpolative_idd_frmi in _interpolativemodule.o
>       _f2py_rout__interpolative_idd_sfrmi in _interpolativemodule.o
>       ...
>
> etc. This is using...
>
> a site.cfg with...
>
> [amd]
> library_dirs = /sw/lib
> include_dirs = /sw/include/suitesparse
> amd_libs = amd
>
> [umfpack]
> library_dirs = /sw/lib
> include_dirs = /sw/include/suitesparse
> umfpack_libs = umfpack
>
> and
>
>    export CC=clang
>    export CXX=clang++
>    export FFLAGS=-ff2c
>    export FC=/sw/bin/gfortran
>
>    unset LDFLAGS
>    /sw/bin/python2.7 setup.py build --fcompiler gnu95
>
> with a build against suitesparse 4.0.2 and numpy 1.7.1.
>       Jack
>
>
> >
> >
> > > Ran 6134 tests in 88.016s
> > >
> > > OK (KNOWNFAIL=15, SKIP=36)
> > >
> > > compared to darwin12...
> > >
> > > Ran 6134 tests in 96.886s
> > >
> > > FAILED (KNOWNFAIL=15, SKIP=36, failures=63)
> > >
> > > and darwin11...
> > >
> > > Ran 6134 tests in 118.346s
> > >
> > > FAILED (KNOWNFAIL=15, SKIP=36, failures=65)
> > >
> > >              Jack
> > > ps I have looked at the proposed replacement of using openblas and it
> is
> > > rather suboptimal. Please
> > > don't inflict that on us.
> > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > SciPy-Dev mailing list
> > > > SciPy-Dev@scipy.org
> > > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SciPy-Dev mailing list
> > > SciPy-Dev@scipy.org
> > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
> > >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > SciPy-Dev mailing list
> > SciPy-Dev@scipy.org
> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list
> SciPy-Dev@scipy.org
> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/attachments/20130831/714febf6/attachment.html 


More information about the SciPy-Dev mailing list