Thu Feb 21 05:52:42 CST 2013
On 21/02/2013 12:41, Pauli Virtanen wrote:
> Pablo Winant <pablo.winant <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> Not sure whether merging it as it is would be a good idea. There is a
>> lot code repetition that make it hard to maintain. But it is
>> conceptually very simple and the code it could be greatly simplified
>> maybe using some code generation.
> It's limited to ndim <= 3, which would be too restrictive at least for
> me. Being a bit more ambitious than using this library could pay off,
> although I'm sure good ideas would come from looking at its implementation.
<=3 too restricted for me too. That's why code generation could be used
for dimension >=4 and it would certainly have excellent performance.
Apart from that I agree that a more general implementation is desirable.
More information about the SciPy-Dev