[SciPy-Dev] Vector Strength function

Todd toddrjen@gmail....
Wed Mar 27 04:37:47 CDT 2013


On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Todd <toddrjen@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:44 PM, <josef.pktd@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Todd <toddrjen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I am interested in implementing a function for scipy.  The function is
>> > called "vector strength".  It is basically a measure of how reliably a
>> set
>> > of events occur at a particular phase.
>> >
>> > It was originally developed for neuroscience research, to determine how
>> well
>> > a set of neural events sync up with a periodic stimulus like a sound
>> > waveform.
>> >
>> > However, it is useful for determining how periodic a supposedly
>> periodic set
>> > of events really are, for example:
>> >
>> > 1. Determining whether crime is really more common during a full moon
>> and by
>> > how much
>> > 2. Determining how concentrated visitors to a coffee shop are during
>> rush
>> > hour
>> > 3. Determining exactly how concentrated hurricanes are during hurricane
>> > season
>> >
>> >
>> > My thinking is that this could be implemented in stages:
>> >
>> > First would be a Numpy function that would add a set of vectors in polar
>> > coordinates.  Given a number of magnitude/angle pairs it would provide a
>> > summed magnitude/angle pair.  This would probably be combined with a
>> > cartesian<->polar conversion functions.
>> >
>> > Making use of this function would be a scipy function that would
>> actually
>> > implement the vector strength calculation.  This is done by treating
>> each
>> > event as a unit vector with a phase, then taking the average of the
>> vectors.
>> > If all events have the same phase, the result will have an amplitude of
>> 1.
>> > If they all have a different phases, the result will have an amplitude
>> of 0.
>> >
>> > It may even be worth having a dedicated polar dtype, although that may
>> be
>> > too much.
>> >
>> > What does everyone think of this proposal?
>>
>> Is this the same as a mean resultant in circular statistics?
>>
>> def circular_resultant(rads, axis=0):
>>     mp = np.sum(np.exp(1j*rads), axis=axis)
>>     rho = np.abs(mp)
>>     mu = np.angle(mp)
>>
>>     return mp, rho, mu
>>
>> Josef
>
>
> It looks to be the same as the first part of my proposal.
>

So does anyone have any opinions on this?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/scipy-dev/attachments/20130327/1d128a2a/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the SciPy-Dev mailing list