[SciPy-Dev] 1.0 roadmap: weave
Thu Sep 26 08:11:38 CDT 2013
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Pauli Virtanen <email@example.com> wrote:
> Arnd Baecker <arnd.baecker <at> web.de> writes:
> > Of course I do understand the reasons to deprecate weave.
> > Personally, I only use cython for new code and Numba looks
> > extremely promising. So surely the question is, whether porting weave is
> > worth the needed effort (as I said, I have no idea how much work is
> > necessary for this).
> If you drop support for some features that relate to stuff in which
> the C API changed a lot in Python 3, such as passing in file pointers,
> porting weave to Python 3 is probably doable without too much trouble.
> Getting the basics working in my estimation is not hard, the trouble
> is in the corners.
How much work is porting to python 3 when using weave? If someone is
porting to python 3 already, would porting away from weave at the same time
add very much additional work?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the SciPy-Dev