[SciPy-user] Type handling of matrices
pearu at scipy.org
Thu Nov 11 04:48:09 CST 2004
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Robert Kern wrote:
> Pearu Peterson wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Robert Kern wrote:
>>> Fernando Perez wrote:
>>>> How about just using functions for everything? I'd really hate to have
>>>> to remember that if A is sparse, A.is<foo> works, but if it's dense I
>>>> need to instead use is<foo>(A).
>>> The big benefit for a property (not method) on sparse matrices is that one
>>> can set A.ishermitian on initialization and all get/set operations will
>>> obey that property.
>>> A = sparse.dok_matrix()
>>> A.ishermitian = True
>>> A[1,2] = 1.
>>> assert A[2,1] == 1.
>> The problem with this approach is that it is not safe. It is too easy
>> to make the following error:
>> A.ishermitian = True
>> A[1,2] = 1.
>> A[2,1] = 2.
>> I would introduce sethermitian(flag=True) method that for an empty matrix
>> sets private A._ishermitian and for a non-empty matrix it first checks
>> if A can be hermitian (if not, it raises an exception).
> Actually, now that I think some more on it, I'd probably make them keyword
> arguments in __init__ and the corresponding properties read-only.
> A[1,2] = 1.
> A[2,1] = 2.
> A.ishermitian = True
> This should raise an error since I can't think of a reasonable action to
I think I like the idea of setting attributes in __init__ very much.
This actually simplifies the code: no need to test if a matrix still has
a specific property everytime the matrix is changed.
Btw, sparse.dok_matrix should also have N,M optional arguments (like
other spmatrix derivatives) to fix the shape. Otherwise, it is rather
difficult to perform matrix-matrix multiplication, for exmaple, with
dok_matrix'ses if the shape depends on its contents.
More information about the SciPy-user