[SciPy-user] Enthon for the Mac
rkern at ucsd.edu
Tue Nov 23 22:16:58 CST 2004
John Hunter wrote:
>>>>>>"Fernando" == Fernando Perez <Fernando.Perez at colorado.edu> writes:
> Fernando> That's probably a wise choice, actually. Forcing users
> Fernando> of the patented stuff to jump through an extra hoop will
> Fernando> help prevent accidental misuse of those algorithms.
> I'm more interested in giving a potential user of my software a
> convenient install than I am in saving a potential developer from
> inadvertently writing some commercial software that requires a
> license. My guess is that 99% of the people who will use enthon/OSX
> satisfy the constraint of not using the patented classes in a
> commercial app, so my preference would be to include it with a
The patent license isn't just needed for implementing marching cubes in
a program that you sell. It's also needed for applying the algorithm for
commercial purposes. If I use VTK(+Patented) to make pretty pictures in
the course of my job, I need to pay for a patent license. Research in an
academic or governmental context may or may not be considered
commercial. In the absence of a clear license for non-commercial and
research use, I'm not tempted to guess their intentions.
My guess is that most people who will be using MacEnthon do not in fact
qualify as non-commercial users but think they do. Not packaging the
patented algorithms removes an attractive nuisance and assuages my
> If someone ignores a suitably positioned disclaimer at the download
> site *and* inadvertently develops an app that requires a license *and*
> wants to distribute it commercially -- we're talking about a
> vanishingly small subset here -- then they do so at their own peril.
> Of course I don't second guess Robert's decision since he is the one
> doing the hard work, but this is how I see it.
rkern at ucsd.edu
"In the fields of hell where the grass grows high
Are the graves of dreams allowed to die."
-- Richard Harter
More information about the SciPy-user