[SciPy-user] SciPy '04 BoF: Making Python Attractive to General
arnd.baecker at web.de
Thu Sep 2 06:44:00 CDT 2004
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004, Joe Harrington wrote:
> Making Python Attractive to General Scientists
> BoF session at SciPy '04
> Joe Harrington, Cornell
> Perry Greenfield, STScI
> Please join us for a BoF on Thursday night.
as I won't be able to come to SciPy '04, I would like to
add a few remarks on this:
python in general
- syntax checker which does not run the code
I think that for a package like Numeric/SciPy
the documentation should also allow for mathematical
formulae. I think that ReSt,
would a good candidate.
There is an experimental latex preprocessor,
Maybe MathMl would be another option?
Using a new command like `ghelp` a graphical
output window could display all this nicely.
More generally, a good help browser would be great
looks most promising and I use it a lot already now!)
In particular, for scientific use the display
of LaTeX formulae (or MathML ?) would be necessary.
((documancer uses wxMozilla, so it should be
possible to do that).
The above proposed `ghelp` could actually
invoke documancer to display the help entry.))
The maple/mathematica or matlab help seem to be
pretty good examples for something like this.
Specifically I think that
- more extensive documentation is needed, IMHO.
In particular, each command should have at _least_
Moreover, technical/algorithmical background
information (with formulae)
would be helpful.
- There should be an easy way for user-contributed
documentation and code-snippets
(which will/could be integrated into scipy
in an automatic (?) way)
((When trying out a command I tend to write a short
example to test whether I understood the description
correctly. If many users would contribute their
mini-examples using a well-defined and simple procedure
that could accumulate quite quickly ...))
P.S.: and of course the `SciPyWorkBench',
might be one important thing to many users.
More information about the SciPy-user