[SciPy-user] (no subject)
oliphant.travis at ieee.org
Fri Feb 24 05:50:04 CST 2006
Adrián López wrote:
> Very strange ... If I change just that single line as you said, it
> runs correctly !!! THANKS!!! How did you know the problem was on that
I'm not sure what the issue is exactly but it might be a bug in Python
itself (though I don't tend to jump to that conclusion quickly). I
figured that line might be a problem, because I kept getting errors (but
not segfaults) from the code at that line.
The errors made no sense to me, but I wondered if on your system,
whatever was causing the problem I was seeing was showing up as a segfault.
It's an interesting test-case, though. I'll look into it some more. I
don't like to leave things like this floating because it may be pointing
to a problem I'm overlooking...
It's hard to say why the numpy version prints an extra line. It
probably has something to do with rounding modes and the fact that in
numpy x is not a Python float but an array-scalar float that (for
now) uses array-math instead of scalar math. The scalar math is coming.
More information about the SciPy-user