[SciPy-user] Renaming scipy_core: here we go again
meesters at uni-mainz.de
Wed Jan 4 01:58:12 CST 2006
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 08:39, Fernando Perez wrote:
> Gerard Vermeulen wrote:
> > Why not
> > scipy (was scipy-core)
> > and
> > scipy++ (was scipy-svn)?
> > Those names are less obscure than the ones proposed and people may guess
> > there is a base package and an extension package.
> import scipy++
> is not valid python.
Good point. But 'import scipyplus' or 'import scipy_plus' would be valid
At least in MHO Gerard's suggestion is finally something creative and
descriptive. (Whereas my solution is not that good anymore, but perhaps
someone of you still knows a way out?)
@Travis: Despite of the naming confusions. Thank you and keep up the good
More information about the SciPy-user