[SciPy-user] Renaming scipy_core: here we go again

Christian Meesters meesters at uni-mainz.de
Wed Jan 4 01:58:12 CST 2006


On Wednesday 04 January 2006 08:39, Fernando Perez wrote:
> Gerard Vermeulen wrote:
> > Why not
> > scipy (was scipy-core)
> > and
> > scipy++ (was scipy-svn)?
> >
> >
> > Those names are less obscure than the ones proposed and people may guess
> > there is a base package and an extension package.
>
> import scipy++
>
> is not valid python.
>
> Cheers,
>
> f

Good point. But 'import scipyplus' or 'import scipy_plus' would be valid 
python.
At least in MHO Gerard's suggestion is finally something creative and 
descriptive. (Whereas my solution is not that good anymore, but perhaps 
someone of you still knows a way out?)

@Travis: Despite of the naming confusions. Thank you and keep up the good 
work!

Cheers
Christian



More information about the SciPy-user mailing list