[SciPy-user] Re-releasing Python Equations under a new license?
ggellner at uoguelph.ca
Fri Jan 19 11:59:15 CST 2007
This is an interesting point, but couldn't you just cut out the piece
of the library and make it a standalone library . . . really this
seems to make LGPL code tricky for reusing algorithms (that can't
easily/efficiently be turned into a library :-), or any piece of code
that is not easily turned into a callable/(subclassable) library?
I have to admit that I to have had to reconsider my ideas on the GPL
since becoming a big fan of python/scipy as well. Though I still
**think** I prefer the GPL, this discussion has been interesting. The
strongest argument for me is that the legal issues can be frightening
for small companies (or individuals), in this sense the BSD to me
seems unambiguously superior.
Sorry if I bubbled up any emotions, I simply had never read JDH's
email before and I found it challenging . . .
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 12:34:21PM -0500, Alan G Isaac wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, John Hunter apparently wrote:
> > LGPL can hinder code reuse.
> This is a key point: the restriction on incorporating
> portions of a library. The other points about legal
> uncertainty and changing rules of the game may or may not
> prove to be well founded, but of course our inability to
> tell is for now exactly the point.
> My exposure to Python has really reshaped my views of the
> GPL, although I still think it can occasionally be
> appropriate. I am inclined to think that avoidance of the
> GPL has been important for the spread of Python and for
> quite a few of the best Python apps. Ruby tries to split
> the difference with a fairly complex licensing arrangement:
> GPL or ... or ... It will be interesting to see how that
> affects its spread beyond academe in the LR.
> Alan Isaac
> SciPy-user mailing list
> SciPy-user at scipy.org
More information about the SciPy-user