[SciPy-user] The IO library and image file formats -- compare with with PIL
Fri Apr 18 03:54:19 CDT 2008
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Sebastian Haase <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Could someone here please summarize the plans for the io library !?
> I saw that there are parts of it going into numpy already.
> And more stuff is already in SciPy -- IIRC.
> What is the status / plans regrading image formats like TIFF.
There are no such plans.
> Are you guys planning to duplicate the efforts of the Python Imaging
> Library ( PIL ) ?
> Or can you just copy-paste some of the code ?
We don't intend to, no.
> The reason I'm asking now, is that I just submitted a patch to PIL
> that adds writing capabilities for MultiPage TIFF files.
> I did not get any response on the PIL list,
> and I'm actually still not clear on their handling of free vs. commercial.
> The commercial PIL license sounds like you have to pay $2000 to get
> access to svn, i.e. the current development version of PIL.
> Anyone here who could comment on this ?
I doubt it. Fredrik Lundh is the person you have to ask about such
things. You might try emailing him personally.
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless
enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as
though it had an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
More information about the SciPy-user