[SciPy-user] NumPy vs. SciPy and other speed comparisons
Wed Jun 11 08:42:46 CDT 2008
Wow, I was typing a message and when I hit "Send" I found all these replies.
Robert, my apologies for my "counterattack" and thank you for the
2008/6/11 David Cournapeau <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> Ivo Maljevic wrote:
> > 2008/6/11 Robert Kern <email@example.com
> > <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>>:
> > Specifically, it is "from scipy import *" that imports the
> > subpackages. "import scipy" does not.
> > Sorry, but I am not sure I understand everything here.
> > 1. "import scipy as sp" vs "import numpy as np", and then I added
> > prefixes in front of all the functions. The times are the same, 44 and
> > 23 seconds, respectively. There goes that theory.
> > 2. I tried explicitly importing only the required functions, e.g,
> > from numpy import sqrt, arange, ones, zeros, random, where, ceil, sign
> > Agian, the same results.
> > Would the loading time of the two packages account for over 20 seconds
> > difference in execution time?
> Ok, the bad guy is..... sqrt. scipy.sqrt is much slower than numpy.sqrt
> (note that in your script, you could avoid computing the scale of the
> normal in the loop).
> SciPy-user mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the SciPy-user